Monday, October 1, 2018

"The Second Coming Of Christ (Revelation 14:6-20)

In Matthew 25:1-13 Jesus tells a parable that teaches us to be ready for his future second coming, a subject he had addressed in Matthew 24. The parable can be understood only once wedding customs of his day are grasped. Here is what happened during first century Jewish weddings:
At a Jewish wedding in the early Christian era a groom would wear a ceremonial crown and… [the groom would arrive [at the home of his parents] during the night prior to a wedding. He was attended by male companions, one of whom would serve as his best man…. Upon his arrival the groom’s family would host a feast…[and he would be] received by a group of young women. Early the next day the friends of the groom would go out to bring back the bride, who would arrive in a sedan chair with the groom’s friends as her symbolic honor guard.
The marriage would be consummated on [that night, after the actual wedding ceremony,] the first night of a banquet celebration typically lasting for seven days….[1]

Jesus’ parable has to do with the young women who would receive the bridegroom at the start of the festivities. In his parable they are called “ten virgins.” Most likely they helped prepare and beautify the bride, then went to the home of the bridegroom to receive him and accompany him into the feast lighting the way and perhaps helping to provide light as the celebration went into the evening. The “lamps” or torches had rags at the end that were soaked in oil, so they would continue to burn. Oil had to be added every fifteen minutes or so to keep them going.[2]

With this background we can now comprehend the parable Jesus told: 
Then the kingdom of heaven will be like ten virgins who took their lamps and went to meet the bridegroom. 2 Five of them were foolish, and five were wise. 3 For when the foolish took their lamps, they took no oil with them, 4 but the wise took flasks of oil with their lamps. 5 As the bridegroom was delayed, they all became drowsy and slept. 6 But at midnight there was a cry, “Here is the bridegroom! Come out to meet him.” 7 Then all those virgins rose and trimmed their lamps. 8 And the foolish said to the wise, “Give us some of your oil, for our lamps are going out.” 9 But the wise answered, saying, “Since there will not be enough for us and for you, go rather to the dealers and buy for yourselves.” 10 And while they were going to buy, the bridegroom came, and those who were ready went in with him to the marriage feast, and the door was shut. 11 Afterward the other virgins came also, saying, “Lord, lord, open to us.” 12 But he answered, “Truly, I say to you, I do not know you.” 13 Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour.


Since Jewish weddings of that day depicted the bridegroom as a king coming for his bride (the queen), it forms a great picture of what it will be like when the ultimate bridegroom and king comes for his bride. This is why Jesus began with these words, “Then the kingdom of heaven will be like….” He is speaking not of the start of the kingdom that came with his first coming (cf. Mk. 1:14-15). Rather, he is looking forward to the future consummation of the full and eternal glorious kingdom, the reign of God forever, over and with his people. It is also not surprising that Jesus uses the young women, the virgins, as a picture of people who are waiting for that coming. After all, if they were to be the true attendants of the bride and if they were to be a genuine part of the marriage feast, they must not only be busy about beautifying the bride, but they must also be prepared for and awaiting with love their blessed hope (cf. Titus 2:13). Jesus depicts five as ready and five as not. The latter five did not care about the bridegroom and bride enough to look forward to his coming and to act as a result. 

What is the point of the parable? It is found in Matthew 25:13: “Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour.” It is to make sure you are part of the first group (those who love the bridegroom and the bride more than themselves), those ready, and not part of the second group (who loved themselves more). The first group will enjoy forever the presence of the bridegroom. The latter will be forever separated from his favorable presence and face judgment.

I have told and explained this parable since it clearly and memorably provides for us the same message we find in Revelation 14:6-20. For here, we also will see that Jesus Christ will come again and with him the full kingdom of glory will be consummated (Rev. 15:1-4). As such, he will bring ultimate salvation to his people, but judgment to those who continue to ignore and/or reject him.

From the inception of the book of Revelation, Christ’s future coming has been established (1:7), but thereafter only alluded to or implied (11:11-12) until this passage. What we find in these fifteen verses are visions (or histories) #5 and #6 in Revelation’s third cycle (12:1-15:4) through this present age. It is the first look in some detail at Christ’s second coming within Revelation and what will happen in conjunction with it and how these future realities should shape our lives now. We are reminded with this passage once again that each cycle through this age does not merely repeat what has gone before, but progressively gives a more detailed look at what happens now, with the second coming of Christ, and with the future consummated kingdom of glory.  

In the first eight verses we find the fifth vision of this cycle.

The Proclamation Of The Gospel And Judgment By Three Angels. 14:6-13
It is not until the sixth vision (14:14-20) that we see clearly what is happening here accompanies the second coming of Jesus Christ. What we find in the fifth vision, through three different angels, are three different messages the world must pay attention to so they can be ready.

Angel One: A Warning Of Judgment To The Unbelieving World, And A Call To Fear God. 6-7
In verse six we read: “Then I saw another angel flying directly overhead, with an eternal gospel to proclaim to those who dwell on earth, to every nation and tribe and language and people.” In our previous post we learned that Revelation 14:1-5 and 15:1-5 form bookends around the fourth through the seventh visions in this third cycle. They let us know that this third cycle has brought us to the end, the consummation of the future full kingdom of glory (15:1-4) and who will be part of the joy of that future kingdom (14:1-5). However, here in the middle part we see there is a warning for those who are ignoring (14:6-13) the coming king (14:14-20).

The first of three angels is referred to as “another angel” because of the angels who have been key parts of earlier visions in the entire work of Revelation, especially as visions were unfolded (cf. 5:2; 7:2; 8:2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12; 9:1, 13; 10:1, 5, 7, 15). All of the references just listed in chapters 8-10 deal with seven angels who had seven trumpets that were integral in the second cycle in the book. The seventh angel is referred to in 10:1 as “another mighty angel” and his trumpet brings the vision to the consummation (cf. 10:15). Most likely, John writes, “another angel” here to tie loosely into those earlier visions. What will be announced here is not only very important (highlighted by the angels, “another angel,” and “mighty voice”), but like with the seventh angel and his trumpet, this part of this cycle brings us also to the consummation of the future full kingdom of glory.

The angel that is “flying directly overhead,” literally “in the midst of the sky” (cf. Rev. 8:13; 19:17) is said to have “an eternal gospel to proclaim.”  It is eternal since it is never changing and also since it has eternal consequences. The fact that it is “a gospel,” rather than “the gospel” (as is more common in the New Testament), does not mean this is a different gospel. The point seems to be that there is a different focus or emphasis than what is typical. The second and third angels will make it clear that the focus here is on why the gospel is needed, i.e. apart from salvation in Jesus Christ, all people are lost and face God’s judgment. It might be that though the focus here is on judgment, the saving part of the gospel is also being proclaimed (“since you are under God’s judgment, repent and trust in Christ!”).

This first angel addresses “those who dwell on earth,” literally, those who sit or are stuck on earth or in an earthly view of things. Such language in Revelation refers to those who are idolatrous and who reject or ignore the true God (3:10; 6:10; 8:13; 11:10a, 10b; 13:8, 12, 14a, 14b; 17:2, 8).  This refers to those whose main existence and allegiance is earthly and is contrasted with those whose main existence is heaven and with Jesus on Mount Zion (14:1-5). And what is said here to and about these earth dwellers is not parochial, but is true of all kinds of people, throughout the whole world—all who have ignored or rejected Christ (“to every nation and tribe and language and people,” see also 10:11; 13:7; and 17:15).

And what did the angel say to all the lost in verse seven “with a loud voice” (emphasizing its heavenly origin and importance)? “Fear God and give him glory.”  There appears to be a dual meaning. On the one hand, most of the times people are called to give God glory in Revelation (twelve times) it is addressed to the community of believers (see a close parallel in 15:4). This also fits with the exhortation at the end of verse seven, “and worship him…,” which elsewhere is always addressed to the believing community. However, there is also a parallel in 11:13 (“the rest were terrified and gave glory to the God of heaven”), where the people are unbelievers coerced to acknowledge God’s sovereignty. There in 11:13 we saw that this is an allusion to Dan. 4:34. Because there are many parallels between Dan. 4 (where Nebuchadnezzar acknowledges the true God, but most likely not as a genuine believer in God) and Rev. 14:6-8, most likely this exhortation is meant to call unbelievers to fear God and give him glory. I believe most likely what is going on here is that the angel is calling unbelievers to trust in the Savior and so to fear God, give him glory, and to worship him in the true and full sense. However, for those who will not, the result will be fear/terror and giving of glory to him in judgment.

Next, we discover why this exhortation is given: “because the hour of his judgment has come.” This has reference to the time of God’s final judgment (see also the same use of “hour” in Rev. 17:12-18) and so it is that much more important that unbelievers reverence God and give him glory in faith and repentance. If they do not, they will fear God and give him glory by means of their being judged!

There are several points of application we must note before continuing.
(1) To begin, as we teach the gospel to others, we must not forget to explain why salvation in Christ is needed. It is because we are sinners and under God’s judgment apart from him. To leave this out is to run the risk of proclaiming a false gospel and a false Savior—namely one who fixes our brokenness, takes us to himself, makes us feel good, and yet does not care about our sin or about how we live. With such a “savior,” we do not reverence and glorify the true God and Savior!

(2) What is more, when a person genuinely trusts in the true Savior, there is a sense of reverence for him and a desire to glorify him. This leads to obedience and transformation (cf. 14:4-5).

(3) Additionally, we must remember this gospel never changes or becomes obsolete. It is always needed.

(4) Finally, we must never forget that God is glorified both in salvation and judgment.

Angel Two: The Pronouncement Of Judgment Upon The World System Referred to As Babylon, For She Has Led Mankind To Blinding-And-Intoxicating Spiritual Adultery. 8
The first part of this verse reads: “Another angel, a second, followed, saying, ‘Fallen, fallen is Babylon the great….’” In Isaiah 21:9a we read, “Fallen, fallen is Babylon” and this is equivalent to the statement in Isaiah 21:9b that Babylon’s idols have been destroyed: “and all the carved images of her gods he has shattered to the ground.” The nation of Babylon was not only used by God in the sixth century, B.C., to judge and discipline wayward, but also was viewed as the epitome of an idolatrous, God-opposing people, who would also persecute those who are righteous. It is no surprise, then, that in Revelation “Babylon” is used as a label for the universal world system that opposes God, persecutes his people, and will be judged by God (16:19; 17:5; 18:1, 2, 10, 21).[3]

In the rest of the verse we discover why this God-opposing world system faces judgment: “‘…she who made all nations drink the wine of the passion of her sexual immorality.’” Here is brought together two different metaphors for idolatry. The first, intoxication, not only has Old Testament precedent (Is. 29:9-10; Jer. 51:7-8; Hos. 4:10-12), but also gives a powerful picture of how idolatry impacts a person. It dulls their senses to both what is good and right, as well as what is dangerous, and it makes people stagger through life. The second, sexual sin, also has Old Testament precedent (Isaiah 57:3-13; Ezek. 16; Hos. 1-3), and it also provides a great picture of what idolatry is:  namely unfaithfulness to God!  Both of these same descriptions are used of the Babylonian world system in Rev. 18:2-3, where it is also made clear that idolatry has demonic origins.

As was discovered in Revelation 13, giving allegiance to the world system that ultimately serves Satan is not only idolatry, but it also brings God’s judgment.

Because all three of these angels and their messages are found in the fifth vision in this cycle and also speak of unbelievers, it is most likely they are parallel and so are describing the same people. In other words, those who are stuck in the world and its thinking (6-7) are those who have given allegiance to the Babylonian world system that is guilty of intoxicating spiritually adultery and deserving of God’s wrath.

This is one of the many passages in Revelation that warn readers against worshiping the world system and warn against being taken in by it. As Jesus Christ reveals himself and the entailments of life in him, he also clarifies how easily we can become unfaithful to God as we give ourselves to counterfeit gods. When this happens, our senses are dulled and we cease to have ears to hear what the Spirit is saying to us (see Rev. 2-3). The problem can be either that we are not genuine believers or that we are believers who have strayed from God and been hardened by the deceitfulness of sin (Heb. 3:12-13).

Angel Three: A Pronouncement Of What Happens To Those Who Reject The Eternal Gospel, Give Into the Strong Influence of Babylon, and Worship The Beast And Its Image. 9-11
In this third statement to the unbelieving world, one that comes from the third angel, we have a conditional statement. The protasis (that part of the condition that communicates, “If this happens”) is found in verse 9: “And another angel, a third, followed them, saying with a loud voice, ‘If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand….’” The worshiping of the beast, its image, and receiving a mark on the forehead or hand come out of Revelation 13. There we saw this was a picturesque way of speaking of the idolatry of worshiping, giving allegiance to, or trusting in the world system and its gatekeepers for our hope, happiness, our significance and security, or our salvation. So, this condition has to do with those earth dwellers (vv. 6-7) who worship the Babylonian-like, intoxicating world system that is unfaithful to God (8).

What happens when people love self, world, anything, or anyone more than God?  We find out in the apodosis of the condition (the “this, then, is what happens” part), which is found in verses 10-11: “‘…he also will drink the wine of God's wrath, poured full strength into the cup of his anger, and he will be tormented with fire and sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever, and they have no rest, day or night, these worshipers of the beast and its image, and whoever receives the mark of its name.’”

In verses 10-11 we discover that those who never repent and turn to the true God and his Savior for salvation will face his judgment, and this consists of just and grievous eternal punishment in hell.

When we put together the messages of all three of these angels, we see that there is only one way of salvation and that is to trust in Jesus Christ as Savior. This is seen especially in light of previous contexts where we see that the only way of Salvation, the only way to know and worship the true God is to receive and rest upon Jesus Christ alone for salvation, the one who lived, died, and was raised in the place of sinners (Rev. 5:9-10; 7:9, 14). The result is that they follow Jesus (14:4) and are sealed by and secure in Jesus (7:1-8; 14:1-5). For those who ignore or reject Jesus Christ, they will face eternal judgment.

As A Result Of The Messages Of The Three Angels, There Is A Call For True Believers To Endure And A Promise Of Reward For Those Who Do. 12-13
First, in verse 12 there is a call for believers to endure in the faith and not to give into idolatry: “Here is a call for the endurance of the saints, those who keep the commandments of God and their faith in Jesus.” Revelation both affirms that genuine saints will persevere (3:5; 15:2; 20:12-15; 21:7) and also affirms that saints must persevere (here and 13:9-10, 18; 22:14). Saints are commanded to persevere, and all should know that no one who professes faith in Christ, but does not endure to the end, will be saved. Yet, all genuine saved persons will heed these calls and warnings and will persevere by God’s grace. In context, the specific call to endure is to avoid giving into idolatry by giving into worship of the Babylonian world system, even if one must pay a great price in this world for not capitulating.

Next, these enduring saints are given motivations for their endurance in verse 13: “And I heard a voice from heaven saying, ‘Write this: Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from now on.’ ‘Blessed indeed,’ says the Spirit, ‘that they may rest from their labors, for their deeds follow them!’” At the very point that life is at its worst and lowest (at the point of death and all that leads to that death), even then true believers experience happiness since they are saved and will experience rest from all their troubles and turmoil. After all, their persevering works that are evidence of their salvation will follow them and assure their eternal reward.

Now that the fifth vision in this third cycle is complete and we have seen both an exhortation to unbelievers to turn to Christ and for believers to persevere, we now come to the sixth vision in 14:14-20, and discover what we are seeing now takes place when Christ comes again to gather believers to himself and to judge unbelievers.

The Son Of Man’s Harvest Of The Earth During His Second Coming: Believers Are Gathered To The Lord And Unbelievers Are Gathered To Suffer God’s Thoroughgoing Judgment At The Very End Of Time. 14:14-20
There are two primary emphases we discover in these seven verses.

The Gathering And Judgment Of Believers. 14-16
Following images first found in Daniel 7 and the coming of the Son of Man[4] and also images that speak of judgment (use of a sickle), we read in 14-16: “Then I looked, and behold, a white cloud, and seated on the cloud one like a son of man, with a golden crown on his head, and a sharp sickle in his hand. 15 And another angel came out of the temple, calling with a loud voice to him who sat on the cloud, “Put in your sickle, and reap, for the hour to reap has come, for the harvest of the earth is fully ripe.” 16 So he who sat on the cloud swung his sickle across the earth, and the earth was reaped.”

The parallelism of verses 14-16 and 17-20, along with similar pictures elsewhere of gathering first believers and then unbelievers (cf. Matt. 13:29–30, 37–43) strongly suggest that we have the gathering and judgment of believers here in 14-16. And, as has already been affirmed, these believers will go into eternal happiness and bliss as they receive their reward (14:12-13).

The Gathering And Judgment Of Unbelievers. 17-20
Here we read: “Then another angel came out of the temple in heaven, and he too had a sharp sickle. 18 And another angel came out from the altar, the angel who has authority over the fire, and he called with a loud voice to the one who had the sharp sickle, ‘Put in your sickle and gather the clusters from the vine of the earth, for its grapes are ripe.’ 19 So the angel swung his sickle across the earth and gathered the grape harvest of the earth and threw it into the great winepress of the wrath of God. 20 And the winepress was trodden outside the city, and blood flowed from the winepress, as high as a horse's bridle, for 1,600 stadia.”

Based upon the phrase, “the great winepress of the wrath of God,” in verse 19 and the vision of blood in verse 20, this is clearly punishment of the wicked.

On the picture of the winepress and the blood, the background to this is Isaiah 63:3, a passage that looks forward to God’s future day of judgment: “I have trodden the winepress alone, and from the peoples no one was with me; I trod them in my anger and trampled them in my wrath; their lifeblood spattered on my garments, and stained all my apparel.” The shedding of blood that involved judgment or punishment could not take place within the boundaries of the city of Jerusalem (Matt. 27:31; Mark 15:20; Luke 23:32; John 19:17; Acts 7:58; Heb. 13:12). Here the city represents the secure abode of God’s people. So, the judgment is “outside the city,” i.e. on those who are not in Christ (see 14:1-5; 21:1-7). 

Finally, on the last part of verse 20, Simon Kistemaker (in his commentary on Revelation) helpfully writes the following:
And the blood came out of the winepress up to the bridles of the horses for a distance of sixteen hundred stadia. This is the first time the word blood appears in the present context. It enlivens the intensity of the conflict between Christ and the anti-Christian forces that face judgment and dreadful punishment. John obviously paints a picture by using the symbolic images of grape juice from a winepress representing blood, and horses with bridles portraying warfare. He writes a similar account of this warfare in 19:11–21. There he mentions the horseman who treads the winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty, whose robe is dipped in blood and whose name is the Word of God, King of kings, and Lord of lords. This rider on a white horse is a judge who judges righteously and a general who engages his enemies in warfare.
The enemy faces complete annihilation to the degree where the level of blood and gore rises as high as the horses’ bridles. The length of this river of blood is 1600 stadia, that is, about 180 miles or 300 kilometers. Some commentators refer this measure to the land of Israel from north to south. Others understand the figure to mean the square of forty. Forty is the traditional number that symbolizes punishment (forty years in the desert [Num. 14:33]; forty lashes for an evildoer [Deut. 25:3]). Still others take the number 1600 symbolically and interpret it as the square of four multiplied by the square of ten; the number four represents the earth and the number ten stands for fullness in the decimal systems.

Conclusion
What we have, then, in the two visions of Revelation 14:6-20 is a clear affirmation that Jesus Christ is coming again to consummate the kingdom of God. And when he does come, he will bring ultimate and complete salvation for his people, but he will also come to judge extensively, fully, and eternally all those who are not his followers and oppose him.

The message of this passage is that a person must not only receive and rest upon Christ alone for salvation, but also persevere in that salvation—not giving into worship of the world system, a temptation to which we easily succumb. Otherwise, Revelation would not warn us about idolatry so frequently!

This future coming of Jesus not only comprises our blessed hope, it also reminds us to be ready for the coming of the bridegroom-king, like those young women in Jesus’ parable in Matthew 25:1-13 who so loved and cherished the bridegroom, they took steps to be ready. May we take care that we not give into the love of the world system around us and may we do as John exhorts us at the end of his first epistle:  “Little children, keep yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21).

Joyfully Persevering In And Awaiting The Bridegroom-King With You,

Tom

[1] This is taken from “Weddings In Ancient Israel,” in the Archaeological Study Bible, 1039. The fact that the wedding ceremony takes place after the bride is brought to the bridegroom, before the consummation of the marriage is taken from Michael J. Wilkins, the ESV Study Bible, 1876, on Matthew 25:1.

[2] The material from these last two sentences come from the Archaeological Study Bible, 1608.

[3] The way that John refers to the idolatrous world system is “Babylon the great” a statement taken from Daniel 4:30. Daniel 4:30, an arrogant and idolatrous affirmation from the lips of Nebuchadnezzar just prior to his humiliation and just after the record of his idolatrous actions in Dan. 3, reads: “Is not this great Babylon, which I have built by my mighty power as a royal residence and for the glory of my majesty?”  The LXX for “great Babylon” has the very same phrase we see here in Rev. 14:8. Regarding “Babylon the great,” Beale, Campbell, Revelation: A Shorter Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015) 302-3, write: “[This is] Nebuchadnezzar’s prideful description (Dan. 4:30). End-time Babylon is about to fall, just as was Nebuchadnezzar…. The ungodly social, political, and economic system dominated by the Roman Empire placed believers in the same position as Israel under Babylon. Therefore, Rome and all wicked world systems take on the symbolic name ‘Babylon the great.’ Indeed, this symbolic interpretation of Babylon is assured beyond reasonable doubt by the prophecies of God’s judgment on historical Babylon, which foretold that Babylon ‘will be desolate forever’ (Jer. 51:26) and ‘not rise again’ (Jer. 51:64; cf. 50:39-40; 51:24-26, 62-64; so also Is. 13:19-22). Thus, that ‘Babylon the Great’ is applied to the ungodly kingdom in the new covenant era shows clearly that it cannot refer to literal Babylon.”

[4] Regarding “a white cloud, and seated on the cloud one like a son of man,” Beale, Campbell, Revelation, 310, write that this is “an allusion to Dan. 7:13 and stands in the interpretive tradition of Mt. 24:30. This tradition usually associates the Son of Man’s coming with both redemption and judgment.” I argue this is a reason for seeing the gathering of believers in 14-16 and judgment on gathered unbelievers in 17-20. Additionally, we see once again that Revelation is announcing the inauguration of the fulfillment of visions Daniel saw and recorded in his book. Simon Kistemaker, Revelation, 416, adds: “John had already alluded to this Old Testament passage when he predicted the return of Jesus “coming with the clouds” and called him “a son of man” (1:7 and 13 respectively).” He adds that this is the only place a “white cloud” occurs in Scripture. It might be a symbol of holiness and judgment. Also, he adds: “these clouds are the exact opposite of dark foreboding clouds that intend to hide God’s glory (Exod. 19:9; 1 Kings 8:12).”

Wednesday, September 26, 2018

Justice And Immigration

This year we have witnessed a debate in our country that at times has been very volatile. It arose because of the Trump administration’s “zero-tolerance” approach to the border and the entrance of illegal immigrants into the U.S, a policy that was announced in April by Attorney General Jeff Sessions. Though the result was to enforce already existing border and immigration laws, an outcome was that the separation of children from parents became much more visible. The public reacted:
Massive public outcry has built over children being separated from their parents as they attempt to cross into the U.S. illegally.
After Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced a “zero-tolerance” policy in dealing with migrants who cross into the U.S. illegally, nearly 2,000 children were separated from their families during a six-week period in April and May.[1]

Though some news outlets have suggested that, as a general rule, children had not been previously separated from parents,[2] according to charities and border and immigration officials near the border, that is simply not true.[3] In fact these same persons see very little change this year, except that there has been more media coverage and scrutiny.[4]

At the same time, some citizens watching on television or reading about the border in newspapers or in on-line articles, may conclude that people are not arriving at the border because of genuine crises in their countries. Sharla Megilligan dispels this when she tells the story of Oscar Suriano, who left Honduras with his young son in May to make his way to the United States. He did this because he owned and operated a small neighborhood food market. Recently local gangs began stopping by randomly and requesting payment. So far he had been able to pay, but he knew there was coming a time when he would be unable to pay and they would kill him. This had happened with other business owners he knew. Suriano made his way to the U.S. since his sister already lives here. After applying for asylum, being processed at the border, and treated very well, Suriano and his son were given two bus tickets to New York where his sister lives. He hopes to bring his wife and daughter from Honduras to join them. His story seems to be the same as many others.

We must see there is a need to be aware of the events going on at the border so we can make good decisions about how and for what we should advocate. Yet, that is often hard to do with all the divergent voices weighing in on the situation.

What there is also a need to do is to seek biblical wisdom on the topic. Most of us reading this post will not have face-to-face contact with people coming into the country at the border, even though we may have contact with people in our own communities who have come into the United States legally and illegally. If we are seeking biblical justice in this current issue, that is, to seek the equitable and impartial application of the rule of God’s moral law to immigration, then we must prayerfully think through this emotionally-charged topic based upon God’s Word.

Because of the difficulty and complexity of some aspects of the immigration debate, these two posts on the subject will not be able to provide a detailed solution to implement. The goal is more modest, to guide us to think through some key bits of biblical wisdom that should shape a solution. Such information can prepare us both when we vote and in the event we would interact with our political leaders who are in positions to seek more specific solutions.[5]

What we will seek to do is to glean truths from three main areas of biblical wisdom to create a truly just approach to immigration.

1. We Must Understand What Wisdom The Bible Gives On Immigration Itself. 
Many people, especially Christians, refer to the Bible for how to deal with the current immigration issues. Yet, many are doing so without understanding what it really says. Many also fail to interpret the material in its biblical and historical contexts, also failing to take a comprehensive approach to what the Bible says.[6] What we will find from the Bible are divine standards that protect the immigrant and, at the same time, guard the nation (and its laws) receiving new people.[7]

We start by merely calling attention once again to the four foundational relationships to which humans must give attention, if they are to flourish: God, self, creation, and others. Our desire should be to advocate approaches to immigration that can encourage attention to all four. Anything less falls short of full biblical justice. Here are examples of what this might look like:
  • When the church in the United States can see that God is bringing the world to us in so many ways and we have opportunities to love, serve, and share with those who come into the country, we grasp that such people can have the opportunity to be saved and thus have a genuine relationship with God (Rom. 10:13-17). Because of this, when possible, we should love, serve, and share with persons coming into our country, even if they have come lawlessly.[8] 
  • There are many situations in which people are refugees and fleeing great danger and horror. In such cases there are deep emotional wounds that result. When possible, we should advocate helping such people. At the same time, we also remember that alleviating resource poverty, a poverty of safety, and a poverty of personal well-being are very important, but there are also other factors we must consider and other kinds of poverty immigrants and refugees have that we should not overlook. 
  • God has given commands (his moral will) that all people are bound to keep if they are to be rightly related to God, his creation, and to other people (Ps. 100; Mt. 22:37-40; Acts 17:30; Rom. 2:14-15; 13:8-10). This includes obeying authorities whom God has placed over us (Rom. 13:1-7). The best approach to immigration for all involved values such authority and the people-protecting-and-benefiting laws governments have (Rom. 13:1-7). This is best for the citizens of the country and eventually for those who immigrate into it. What is more, it establishes a pattern that is consistent with how God has created the world—that there is right and wrong, and the reason we need a Savior is that we fall short of his righteousness, his standards—in other words, we all are sinners (Rom. 3:9-26, esp. 23). As such, the church should not encourage persons to disobey the laws of the government, unless they are being commanded to do something contrary to the moral will of God (Acts 5:29). 
One other matter we must touch on before launching into the biblical teaching on immigration has to do with the fact that we will refer to material in the Old Testament. We must be clear on how we as New Covenant believers relate to the Old Testament material. Some suggest none of it applies, others imply it all does. How should we relate to it? Here are some simple points that should guide us.[9] 
  • When the New Testament makes the point we are no longer under the law (e.g. Rom. 6:15; Gal. 4:5, 21; 5:18), its intent is that we are no longer morally bound under the mosaic covenant and the laws associated with it (Gal. 2:11-14; 3:10-29), a covenant and set of laws that was intended from its inception to be temporary and to prepare for the Christ (Gal. 3:22-29). Material outside of these specific laws (such as Genesis 1-Exodus 19) and that the New Testament clarifies is still applicable, such as the Ten Commandments—all but the sabbath command (e.g. Rom. 13:8-9; Eph. 4:15; 6:1-3; Col. 2:16; 1 Jn. 5:21)—these are commands to which we are still morally bound. 
  • We must see all Old Testament commands in light of the differences between the Old Covenant and the New Covenant. The fact that during the time of the mosaic covenant God’s people were primarily located within a nation that was to attract the rest of the world to worship God, but now God’s people are located throughout all nations and not primarily located in one nation, changes how we relate to laws in the Old Testament that address how that nation was to function. On the one hand we can say we are not morally bound to try and make either the church or the nation in which we live follow the exact details of those laws. On the other hand, those laws still reveal something about God’s will and wisdom for how we are to function.[10] This seems to be how the New Testament deals with some of the Old Testament laws set forth for the nation. For example, the legal standard that a person was not to be convicted merely upon the testimony of one witness, the fact that the more witnesses the better to corroborate the testimony (Dt. 17:6; 19:15) stands behind Paul’s admonition to Timothy in 1 Tim. 5:18 that the same kind of standard should be applied in the church when it comes to accusations against leaders. Such suggests that the matter of considering a person innocent until proven guilty is how we love others by treating them how we would want to be treated (Mt. 7:12), namely to give them the benefit of the doubt until we absolutely cannot (1 Cor. 13:7).[11]
  • Similar to and flowing out of this previous point, even in legislation within the mosaic/Sinai covenant, there is to be found wisdom and insight into how we are to love God and love others. So, for example, laws given to Israel regarding those who came into their borders display how God wanted Israel to love others in ways that are consistent with the four foundational relationships humans must address to flourish. Because of this and because of the fact that nothing in the New Testament suggests an overruling of such wisdom or the basic direction of practice, and because these laws and practices form an historical context for how to understand what the Bible would have to say about immigration, it is beneficial to look at and be guided by what we find, even in the Old Testament. 
  • All dietary, festival, sabbath, sacrificial, and tabernacle/temple laws that by their very nature were temporary and intended to prepare for and look to the coming of Christ are no longer binding now that Christ has come and fulfilled them (Mk. 7:19; John 1:14; 2:19; Acts 10:15; Col. 2:16-17; Heb. 8-10). 
So, what we discover is that we cannot simply say the Old Testament does not apply in total or it does apply in total. We must be willing to think carefully through specific laws and then decide what applies and how. If we are willing to do this, I believe what we will find about immigration is very helpful to determine what God would want the church to do in particular and also how Christian citizens should call its government to respond in general.[12]

With these preliminary matters covered, we are now ready to take a quick tour through the Bible to see what wisdom it has for a just approach to immigration.

Immigration And Immigrants In Abraham’s World[13]
Even though things were very different in the cultures of the ancient near east, even then “…there were clearly delineated lands or countries, some large and others tiny.”

A question emerges. Were ancient borders taken seriously and was national sovereignty recognized? 
The answer is emphatically yes. Not only were wars fought to establish and settle border disputes, borders were vigorously defended, and battles occurred when a neighboring state violated another’s territory. So national boundaries were normally honored.  See Numbers 20:16-21 where Israel requested passage through Edom and was denied.  It is worth noting that even a traveler, a foreigner, passing through the territory of another had to obtain permission to do so.

We can even say more. “On the individual, family, and clan level, property was owned and boundaries established…. The Mosaic Law prohibited the removal of landmarks (Dt. 19:14) and an even stronger denunciation is made in Dt. 27:17: ‘Cursed is the man who moves his neighbor’s boundary stone.’” Additionally, we see in Job 24:2: “Theft is associated with moving boundary stones by the sage Job.”

We also discover that Abram was an immigrant (Gen. 11:27-12:3). “In Canaan Abraham identifies himself to the Hittites of Hebron as a sojourner or alien (ger, Gen. 23:4), a person (or family) who resides, temporarily or permanently, outside his or her homeland.”

Because Abraham’s descendants eventually went to Egypt, we should look at immigrants and foreigners in ancient Egypt, a land that, not unlike America today, was a land of wealth and opportunity to other peoples—implied in Gen. 46:34, where it is said, “For all shepherds are detestable to the Egyptians.” Archaeological finds have discovered that Egypt had border guards through which people must pass to enter.  
Clearly the Egyptians were not anti-immigration or against foreigners per se (an impression you might get from reading the early chapters of Exodus), but they did want their sovereignty respected and their borders protected, and they wanted to control who entered their land and why. It is fair to say that this is the attitude of most countries today…. Since 1999 I have directed excavations at Tell el-Borg in northwest Sinai. There we have discovered and excavated the remains of two frontier forts just in Sinai, six miles east of the Suez Canal, that defended a strategic area near the border between 1450 and 1200 B.C.

Since we brought up the subject of Abraham being an alien, we need to define what this is. Several things can be said: 
  • “The Hebrew word usually translated ‘stranger,’ ‘alien,’ or ‘sojourner’ derives from the verb gwr, which occurs eighty-one times in the Old Testament. It means ‘to sojourn’ or ‘to dwell as a stranger, become a refugee.’ As a noun, ger is found eighty-two times in Hebrew. More than 160 occurrences of these words indicate just how common aliens were in ancient Israel’s experience.” We must understand that this word group is almost always used differently in the Old Testament than nekhar and zar, both of which can accurately be rendered “foreigner.” 
  • “From the Bible and ethnographic[14] evidence it is [clear] that outsiders were able to enter and stay in a foreign land because they were offered hospitality by a host, and one’s status as an alien was an extension of that welcome.” 
  •  “The word [sojourner] (ger) is sometimes coupled with the term ‘resident’ (toshav, lit. ‘one who resides’), the second word Abraham attributes to himself [in Gen. 23:4]. Rather than translating this expression as “[a sojourner and foreigner],”the two terms together likely mean ‘resident alien.’ Such individuals or families, a clan or tribe, are those who have essentially taken up permanent residence in a foreign land, as Abraham and his family had done in Hebron with the permission of their host. In fact, the residents of Hebron acknowledged Abraham’s status as being one who is ‘among us’ (23:6) rather than viewing him as a foreigner (nekhar or zar).”
  • “The distinction between the two is not only that the aliens (gerim) have resided with a host nation for a period of time, but that ‘they have abandoned their homeland for political[, religious,] or economic reasons and sought refuge in another community. In other words, the ger regards the land of his sojourning as the new home for a protracted time period while the foreigner [nekhar or zar] does not.”[15] “…in the Bible the foreigner and the alien/sojourner were not the same and should not be confused.” 
  • “Typically the foreigner is one who travels through a country or is there for business purposes. As a consequence…the Law prescribes for aliens certain legal protection as well as social and religious benefits that foreigners (nekhar or zar) do not get…. This is why the meaning ‘protected citizen’ can also be applied to the word ger.”  Hoffmeier goes on to say that this alien, sojourner, or protected citizen is a prolonged guest. He was not entitled to offer hospitality to others—i.e. to invite them into the country. “The right of granting hospitality is reserved to citizens” (even Joseph as a high ranking official in Egypt had to get permission for his family to come). An exception would be marrying someone from your original community and having them come to live in the new community. 
  • He goes on to argue that the alien/sojourner (ger) followed legal procedures to gain recognized standing as a resident alien. So, Hoffmeier suggests they are parallel to legal immigrants today. (emphasis added0
So, what we have discovered early in our tour through Scripture is that in the cultures represented in the Old Testament (and especially that of Israel), borders were to be respected and there was a difference between legal and illegal immigrants and how they were viewed. Immigrants were to abide by the laws of the land. As we move on through the Bible we will discover that these findings stay constant.

The Story Of The Israelite Exodus[16] 
In biblical passages about Israel’s time in Egypt and their subsequent exodus, the Israelites were termed “aliens” (gerim) in Egypt (Ex. 23:9). The terms, as we saw them above, are used very consistently throughout these texts and agree with what we have said above.

One very significant point found in these passages is that once the Israelites had been delivered, they were called to love and not mistreat aliens coming into their land since they had been aliens in Egypt (Ex. 22:9; 23;9). This also forms a backdrop for New Covenant believers who are to prioritize extending mercy to others (Mt. 18:21-35; 23:23), and extend grace and forgiveness since grace and forgiveness have been shown to them (Eph. 4:31-32; Col. 3:13).

The Law And The Alien[17] 
We discover that the Law material in the Old Testament has much to say about aliens or sojourners.

The people of God under the Old Covenant were commanded to “love your neighbor as yourself “(Lev. 19:18) and this involves loving the alien since the Israelites were aliens (Lev. 19:34).

Regarding the difference between aliens/sojourners and foreigners, Israelites could not charge the former and fellow Israelites interest on loans (Lev. 25:35-37), but they could to foreigners (Dt. 15:3). Aliens were to be treated as native-born, not mistreated, and they were to be loved (Lev. 19:33-34). Aliens have the same legal protection as native-born or citizens (Lev. 24:22; Nu. 15:15-16; Dt. 1:15-17). Social benefits were given in the OT to legal immigrants (aliens/sojourners) and citizens alike (Lev. 19:9-10; 23:22; Dt. 24:19-22; 26:12-13).

Since the idea of “sanctuary” has come up in recent times, especially in cities that have made themselves “sanctuary cities” to protect illegal immigrants from the penalties of federal laws, it is needed that we go back and look at the concept of “sanctuary” in the Old Testament, especially since some (though by no means not all) people want to suggest sanctuary cities are in line with Old Testament thought.
The idea and practice of sanctuary is rooted in the Law given at Mt. Sinai. (Exodus 21:12-14; Nu. 35:11-29)  …The biblical practice of sanctuary, then, was to protect the offender from vigilante justice and to ensure that he received a fair trial. Should a person come to the sanctuary who was guilty of intentionally murdering someone, he would be removed from the protection of the sanctuary and receive his punishment. This practice is clearly spelled out in Exodus 21:24: “Take him away from my altar and put him to death.”  …Sanctuary was never intended as a place to avoid the law but to allow the law to take its proper course rather than retaliation when it was not called for. While both Israelite citizens and aliens qualified for sanctuary (cf. Nu. 35:15 and Josh. 20:9), being an illegal alien was not a criterion for such protection. Consequently, American cities and churches who offer sanctuary for illegal immigrants cannot claim to be following the practice described in the Bible.

Having covered the Old Testament, we now turn to the New.[18]

Jesus And The New Testament[19] 
Right away, we see that Jesus was a refugee and alien in Egypt (Mt. 2:13-15). We know that Joseph and Mary and Jesus would have passed through forts or checkpoints to be given permission to enter and stay in Egypt. Philo of Alexandria affirms there was a large number of Jews in Egypt at this time, which would have given them community and Joseph employment opportunities.

In the New Testament we also discover a new twist with “alien” language.  Christians, that is, true followers of Jesus Christ, are said to be aliens in this world (Heb. 11:8-10, 13-16; 1 Pt. 1:1; 2:11).  Yet, at the same time, they are not foreigners and aliens, but fellow citizens, in regard to the people of God (Eph. 2:19). These spiritual realities seem to be built upon and consistent with the more literal uses of the terms in the Old Testament.

One other note we can make from New Testament teaching at this point. Christians are to submit to and obey the laws and authorities over us where we live—and the implication is that all citizens, Christian or not, should (Rom. 13:1-7). As a result, Hoffmeier writes: “Based on this clear instruction, I believe that citizens and foreigners should be subject to a nation’s laws, and this applies to immigration laws and how one enters a country and becomes a legal resident….”

This provides a good transition into our next area of biblical wisdom we must discuss. We will take up that area and the third area in our next post.

Joyfully Pursuing Justice With You,

Tom


[1] Kaitlyn Schallhorn, “What Trump's 'zero-tolerance' immigration policy means for children separated from families at border,” at foxnews.com (accessed 9/19/18).
We should note that the separations happen because the way the laws currently read at the time of the zero tolerance policy announcement, when illegal immigrants enter the U.S. and are caught they are detained. Yet, legally there is a limit to how long their children could be detained in the same facilities. As Sharla Megilligan, “At the Mexico-Texas frontier, truth and lies,” World (July 21, 2018), 36ff., has written even the previous administration, because of this law, sent children to federally funded children’s homes.

[2] e.g. Camila Damonoske, Richard Gonzales, “What We Know: Family Separation And ‘Zero Tolerance’ At the Border” (June 19, 2018), at npr.org (accessed 9/20/18).

[3] Sharla Megilligan, “At the Mexico-Texas frontier, truth and lies,” World (July 21, 2018), 36ff.

[4] Megilligan, “At the Mexico-Text Frontier,” 36ff.

[5] Though I will not offer a detailed solution, I do want to say more than some have. Recently Mindy Belz interviewed Fuller Theological Seminary professor, Matthew Kaemingk, on a recent book he had written. In essence, according to that interview, the main point he is making is that we must be compassionate toward people coming into the country, something to which Jesus called us. Though I have not read the book, that article made it sound like the professor ignored other bits of biblical wisdom that are also important.  See Mindy Belz, “Matthew Kaemingk, “A Space For Freedom: Offering Hospitality To Muslims In America,” in World, August 18, 2018: 26-27. I do not want this discussion about immigration to be truncated and one dimensional. Hopefully we can engage in a reasonably full and balanced treatment of the biblical truths that should shape our approach to the topic.

[6] James K. Hoffmeier, The Immigration Crisis: Immigrants, Aliens, And The Bible (Wheaton: Crossway, 2009, Kindle ed.), ch. 1, agrees with this assessment.

[7] Hoffmeier, The Immigration Crisis, ch. 1 (loc. 265).

[8] As we will see below, we never encourage such persons to break the law.

[9] For a helpful and accessible treatment of this subject, see Wayne Grudem, “Using The Old Testament For Ethical Guidance,” which is chapter 8 in his book Christian Ethics: An Introduction To Biblical Moral Reasoning (Wheaton: Crossway, 2018), 209-263. I am dependent upon his treatment for these points.

[10] In speaking specifically about Old Testament Scripture, which was all that was in place at the time, Paul wrote that all of it is inspired by God and profitable for us (2 Tim. 3:16-17). See also Rom. 15:4; 1 Cor. 10:6.

[11] Another example would be Leviticus 19:15: “You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor.” This basic principle seems to supersede temporary laws only for a nation, but to communicate how we apply God’s righteous will equitably to all. The history of jurisprudence in the U.S. has been wise to suggest that justice is blind, based upon this biblical wisdom. Another way the Old Testament has provided wisdom for jurisprudence is to distinguish between different kinds of taking of life, whether it be government-induced capital punishment (Gen. 9:6; Nu. 35:31), self-defense (Ex. 22:2-30, an accident (Ex. 21:12-14; Nu. 35:9-34), or pre-meditated (Ex. 20:13; 21:12-14; Nu. 35:16; 31). This is consistent with God’s treatment based upon the intent of their heart (e.g. 1 Sam. 16:7). Intentional unlawful taking of life is very different than unintentional taking of life. God calls people in all times to love, not hate (Lev. 19:9-18).

[12] It was Abraham Kuyper, theologian and prime minister of the Netherlands in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, who coined the term “sphere sovereignty” (especially seen in his 1898 presentation, “Lectures On Calvinism,” as part of the Stone Lectures at Princeton). This label is a helpful description of what the Bible teaches regarding the authority of different institutions or spheres within society (e.g. Mt. 22:21; Rom. 13:1-7; Eph. 6:1-4). This must be kept in mind to guide the Christian in how he or she relates to the different spheres. An example will help. Suppose that Joe, a U.S. citizen who lives just north of the border in southern Texas, is employed by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency. What this means is that he is tasked, as an agent of the government, with prohibiting people from coming into the U.S. illegally. That is a role the U.S. government in general and he in particular has so they can help in the protection, defense, and orderly operation of the country, as well as in penalizing law breakers (Rom. 13:3-4). Joe is also a Christian, part of the church. His local congregation loves, serves, and shares with illegal immigrants who are caught trying to cross the border and detained. They also love, serve, and share with illegal immigrants who are not caught (and part of what they seek to do is encourage them to obey the law). Joe’s role is very different in each sphere (the church and CBP). It is primarily the job of the government to protect and supervise the border and, as we will see, this is a good thing. At the same time, the church is not primarily tasked to protect and oversee the border, even though U.S. citizens who are part of the church are to obey U.S. laws and encourage others to do the same. What this all means is that the church can and should love, serve, and seek to make disciples of people who come across the border legally and illegally as a primary role. At the same time, the government is not tasked as a primary role with those tasks (even though this does not mean the government cannot be compassionate or operate in such a way that love, service, and sharing can take place. So, at one and the same time, the Christian can advocate for compassion and love toward illegal immigrants and, at the same time, they can advocate for border security and the enforcement of U.S. laws.

[13] Unless otherwise noted, all quotes in this sub-section are taken from Hoffmeier, The Immigration Crisis, ch. 2. All other material, unless otherwise noted, is also dependent upon this chapter from Hoffmeier.

[14] Merriam-Webster (on-line) defines ethnography this way: “the study and systematic recording of human cultures; also : a descriptive work produced from such research.” So, “ethnographic”could be defined this way: “relating to the scientific description of peoples and cultures with their customs, habits, and mutual differences.”

[15] Hoffmeier goes on to say of the nekhar or zar, i.e. the foreigner (both terms used at times parallel to each other: Ex. 30:33; Is. 28:21; Lam. 5:2), he was not a permanent resident as was the ger. “A foreigner could be an invading enemy (…Is. 1:7; Obad. 11) or squatters who moved into Israel when the Israelites were removed to Babylon (…Lam. 5:2). But for the most part in Israel, foreigners were those who were passing through the land with no intention of taking residence, or perhaps they would be temporarily or seasonably employed.”

[16] All quotes in this subsection are taken from Hoffmeier, The Immigration Crisis, ch. 3. All other material is also dependent upon that chapter.

[17] All quotes in this subsection are taken from Hoffmeier, The Immigration Crisis, ch. 4. All other material is also dependent upon that chapter.

[18] In chapters 5-7 of his book, The Immigration Crisis, Hoffmeier looks at how terms were used in the rest of the Old Testament and affirms they were used consistently with what has been set forth already.

[19] All quotes in this subsection are taken from Hoffmeier, The Immigration Crisis, ch. 8. All other material is also dependent upon that chapter.